Peer Review Academy Gain structured training in peer review with guidance from experienced reviewers

Launching July 2026, this year-long program prepares early- and mid-career STI professionals to become confident peer reviewers and future editorial leaders through mentored reviews, cohort learning, and individualized feedback.

Applications will be accepted April 6 – May 4, 2026

Apply for the Academy

What You'll Experience

Mentored peer reviews with expert feedback

Year‑long cohort learning and support

Publication ethics and bias awareness training

Why Structured Peer Review Training Is Essential

Peer review is essential to scientific quality and trust. Yet many early- and mid-career professionals are asked to review without structured guidance on what editors look for, how to write constructive feedback, or how to navigate ethics, bias, and decision-making.

Build practical peer‑review skills

The Peer Review Academy is designed to strengthen core peer‑review competencies through direct experience and mentorship. Participants receive guidance from STD Journal associate editors and editorial board members while completing real reviews and reflecting on editorial feedback.

Here’s how the Academy works

Step 1: Apply

Submit your application materials for consideration.

Step 2: Get Matched

If selected, you’ll be matched with dedicated mentors and welcomed into the cohort.

Step 3: Review + Grow

Complete four mentored reviews, attend cohort meetings, and receive individualized feedback across the year.

Applications OpenApril 6, 2026
Applications CloseMay 4, 2026
Notification of AcceptanceMay 31, 2026
LaunchJuly 2026

What You'll Gain

Hands-on peer review experience with real editorial mentorship
A repeatable review framework you can use across journals
Publication ethics, bias, and decision-making insight
Practice writing fair, timely, constructive reviews
Individualized feedback to sharpen your voice and judgment
Professional visibility within the STI scholarly community (aligned with your “future editorial roles” statement)

Who Should Apply?

If you’re being asked to review manuscripts and want a clearer framework and meaningful feedback, this program is built for you. It’s designed for professionals who want to grow as reviewers, contribute with confidence, and play a more intentional role in shaping what gets published.

Good Fit If You…

Are early or mid-career and want structured feedback on reviews
Want to strengthen publication ethics / bias awareness
Can commit to mentored reviews across the year

Not the Best Fit If…

Need a one-time workshop only
Unable to commit to the full program timeline
An applicant outside academia or public health systems

Minimum Eligibility:

An Active member of ASTDA
At least one published paper as first author
Working in, or closely aligned with the STI Field (prioritized)

Our Commitment to Inclusive Participation

The Academy is committed to broadening participation in peer review and editorial leadership. We especially encourage applications from underrepresented and marginalized communities by prioritizing applicants who:

People from underrepresented or historically marginalized backgrounds
People with equity as a research focus area
People working outside academia in public health setting

In addition, priority consideration may be given to applicants within 7 years of completing a terminal degree and those working in academic, clinical, or public health roles.

Ready to Apply?

Apply to join the inaugural cohort and help strengthen the future of STI publishing.

Apply for the Academy